All artists, especially
visual artists, are conscious of values as they relate to the darkness and
lightness of color. Pure black and
pure white are classic examples of two extremes in value. With a little imagination one can
imagine a series of boxes or circles, starting with a pure black and gradually
becoming lighter until the last one is pure white, with a ranged of grays in
between. This is a value scale
which can be applied to all colors, and paintings done using the extreme end of
this scale generally evoke more interest than ones rendered almost entirely in
a small range of values. The
movement between the two extremes, in art, music, and life in general creates
tension and interest. Clearly
there are times when a far more consistent demeanor or palette is desirable,
but for this narrative, the emphasis is on the black and white.

Unfortunately, in spite of
its artistic desirability, the world in which we live is not black and
white. Instead, with few
exceptions, we live in a world of varying degrees of gray, although you might
not know that based on the current public political discourse in our country
today. According to many
politicians, columnists, and talking and blogging heads, everything and
everyone is right or wrong, good or bad, or weak or strong. If you propose a new government service
you are a Socialist. If you
believe in a strong free market you are a greedy capitalist. It is so much easier for
politicians to identify themselves and appeal to their bases - generally in the
extremes of each party - than to honestly acknowledge that good ideas can be
found across the political spectrum, and that no one has a monopoly on the
truth. Woe be to the politician
who vainly tries to see the middle ground; he or she is quickly labeled someone
who cannot be or act decisively, and cannot be counted to support the party,
and clearly the good of party is more important than that of the country. Blaming the other side is more
important than listening or seeking common ground. Today no one is willing to publicly grant praise on someone
of the opposition until he or she dies, and even then it is often
equivocal.
Sadly this movement to the
extremes exists in all arenas of public discourse. It is easier, less complicated, and for some probably less
threatening, than attempting to acknowledge, let alone see all sides of an
issue. It is a large black v white
hat that easily accommodates conservatives, liberals, corporate executives,
union leaders, as well as those “of faith” and without faith.
This state of affairs
distresses me greatly. There was a
time I enjoyed the news, written, spoken, and otherwise, and looked forward to
the morning coffee and the newspapers.
Now it is a chore I force upon myself, feeling it is my civic
responsibility. The worst part of
this is that I can see no signs of improvement, either now or in the
future. Until we place the greater
good before our own ideology and interests we are doomed to be governed by
ineffective politicians and powerful self interests, and to be bombarded by
pompous self righteous noise from all sides. Undoubtedly there are many reasons for this current state of
affairs, but one that stands out, at least in my mind, is the 24 hour news
cycle with its need for filler, usually a talking head who speaks with or
without validated information, relying greatly on the opinion of “experts”, and
presenting us with a black and white world of either or; the discourse is
devoid of all but the extremes.